Home Care Law Blog Gilliland  & Markette LLP


3905 Vincennes Road
Suite 204
Indianapolis, IN 46268
Phone: (317) 704-2400
Fax: (317) 704-2410

HHABNs - Still Confusing

Posted by: Robert Markette
December 07, 2006

Let me start by apologizing for my infrequent posts the last few weeks.  But with the holidays and work being exceptionally busy this time of year (and not a lot of new developments in the world of home health) I have had limited time and material.  However, this week, I have noticed an upswing in questions relating to the HHABN.  It seems that now that people have settled in with the HHABN, they are discovering unusual scenarios or reevaluating their use of the HHABN in an effort to lessen the number of HHABNs they are issuing.

Frankly, I am not surprised.  In part, once the home health community implemented their HHABN “system” and became comfortable with it, it was only a matter of time before they began to realize that in many cases, they may have erred on the side of caution.  The other issue is that providers have had a few months to have unusual cases come up.  If you have read the HHABN transmittal, you will notice that for all of CMS’s efforts, there are many situations for which the answer “Do I need to issue an HHABN” is not obvious.

For example, a recent question I received from a seminar viewer involved the need to issue an HHABN after a one time “unplanned” nursing visit.  This could come up in a number of ways, but the main point is issue leading to an additional nursing visit during week that exceeds the POC frequency for the week.  There is no change to the POC as a result and the next week the visits remain as in previous weeks.  For example, HHA patient suffers from a slip and fall at home.  Because it is apparently a minor slip, not requiring a 911 call, patient calls agency asking if she needs additional care.  Agency sends nurse out to the home to check on the patient and make sure patient is ok.  (Many of you are probably saying, we just tell them to call 911, this may be a good idea, but the point of this post is how would such a situation affect your need to issue an HHABN.)  The patient’s POC calls for 2-3 vists per week and this visit happens to be number four for that week.  As a result of the visit, there is no change to the POC or any other action taken.

Obviously, the additional visit does not require an HHABN, because it is an increase in care.  Increases in care are one of the express exceptions to the HHABN requirement.  However, the next week you effectively have a decrease from 4 visits to 3.  Reductions in frequency are reductions in care that, in most cases, require an HHABN.

Most providers would react to this situation by issuing an HHABN, but lamenting the waste of time and paper.  However, in this case, you do not need to issue an HHABN.  The unplanned alteration in frequency is a minimal change.  There is not alteration of the underlying plan of care and the visit itself was an unplanned visit.  The Court in Lutwin specifically said that certain “de minimus” or minimal alterations to a POC would not require an HHABN.  (Of course, I will not touch on whether this is the appropriate way to respond to the slip and fall, as opposed to calling 911)

CMS has not adopted a specific minimal change exception, but instead adopted exceptions for the specific minimal examples provided by the Court – sick employees, missed visits, etc.  This one time visit is a similar example of a minimal change.  It also happens to fit into the concept of an unplanned or emergency visit.  However, it is the nature of the visit – patient calling for the agency to check on them after an in home incident – that makes this an unplanned visit.  (Of course, you should consider advising the patient to call 911 if the patient thinks it is an emergency.) 

If the visit resulted in an alteration of the POC that led to a reduction in care, an HHABN would be necessary.  You should not understand the minimal change concept to be a broad exception, but to be a very narrow exception.

        

News

Health Care

[08/15] Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners Reports Second Quarter 2008 Financial Results
[08/15] Salmonella outbreak winds down; questions remain
[08/15] 6 get Legionnaires' disease in upstate NY; 1 dies
[08/15] NYC heroes lift bus off pregnant woman; baby saved
[08/15] NYC heroes lift bus off pregnant woman; baby saved
[08/15] Former half-ton man endures hard times in Nebraska
[08/15] AP Interview: Doctor behind executions speaks out
[08/14] University Hospitals Receives $22.6 Million Donation from Harrington and McLaughlin Families
[08/14] The National Kidney Foundation's 7th Annual Ronald D. Paul Companies Kidney Walk to be Held on Saturday, September 20
[08/14] Best Practice Database adds Research on New Product Launch
Read More





Web Resources

FindLaw
Thomson West
U.S. Courts
Westlaw
United States Chamber of Commerce
FirstGov
Legislative Branch
Library of Congress
White House
Internal Revenue Service
National Weather Service
Yahoo!Maps
YellowPages.com
New York Times
Newspapers Online
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
AOL
Google
Yahoo!Legal Blog Directory  


The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

Copyright © 2008 by Home Care Law Blog Gilliland & Markette LLP. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.