| Home | |
| Attorneys | |
| Contact Us | |
| Site Map | |
|
Subscribe |
![]() | ![]() |
|
3905 Vincennes Road
Suite 204 Indianapolis, IN 46268 Phone: (317) 704-2400 Fax: (317) 704-2410 |
|
|
Posted by: Robert Markette The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois recently reiterated the Seventh Circuit’s position on discovery in federal question actions after HIPAA. In U.S. ex. rel., Anthony J. Camillo v. Ancilla Systems, Inc., (S.D. Ill. November 7, 2005), the Court addressed a hospital’s motion for a protective order that would have redacted the medical records provided to exclude any identifying information. The hospital’s basis for this request was a requirement in Illinois regarding non-party patient information. This Illinois law would require redaction before disclosure, which the hospital argued was more restrictive than HIPAA. The hospital reasoned that because Illinois state law required redaction the Federal court should require it as well. The District Court, relying upon the 7th Circuit’s decision in Northwest Memorial Hospital v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 923 (7th Cir. 2004) ruled that the Illinois statute was not applicable to discovery in a federal court in which the case was based upon a question of federal law. Because the state privilege laws do not apply in federal courts, they cannot preempt HIPAA. Therefore, redaction was not necessary. This ruling makes sense, because the preemption analysis is only necessary if the Illinois statute applies. However, federal courts rely upon federal common law, not state law when addressing questions of privilege and discovery. Furthermore, HIPAA was not intended to create a federal privilege against discovery. Under HIPAA, a non-party’s medical information may be disclosed to the litigants, as long as the required assurances are provided. |
NewsHealth Care
[08/15] Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners Reports Second Quarter 2008 Financial Results Topics
Adminstrative Law Recent UpdatesJuly 18, 2008 May 29, 2008 May 28, 2008 May 13, 2008 May 08, 2008 Archives
July, 2007 Web ResourcesFindLaw |
|
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Copyright © 2008 by Home Care Law Blog Gilliland & Markette LLP. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. |