| Home | |
| Attorneys | |
| Contact Us | |
| Site Map | |
|
Subscribe |
![]() | ![]() |
|
3905 Vincennes Road
Suite 204 Indianapolis, IN 46268 Phone: (317) 704-2400 Fax: (317) 704-2410 |
|
|
Posted by: Robert Markette According to IT Research Group HIPAA is an ineffective “toothless tiger.” The group laments the lack of convictions for HIPAA violations and believes a complaint driven system is ultimately ineffective. The group feels that healthcare executives need to be subject to liability for HIPAA violations in the same way they are subject to liability under other federal laws. The Group also feels that HIPAA should be enforced more vigorously, in a manner similar to the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Based upon what I have seen from providers, the vast majority are complying, in fact, they were guarding patient privacy quite well before HIPAA. Because of this experience, I disagree with the idea that the government needs to enforce HIPAA more rigorously. The groups complaint overlooks is the difference between medical records privacy and other privacy laws. The medical profession, like the legal profession, has a long history of zealously guarding patient privacy. Patient privacy was governed by laws, regulations, and professional ethics long before the federal government decided to regulate patient privacy. HIPAA, let us not forget, was a classic example of one or two well publicized mistakes leading to a rather sweeping, and unnecessary, federal regulation. Patient privacy is not in any danger because the Feds have only obtained one conviction since 1996. Furthermore, the fact that the feds have only prosecuted one case to conviction does not mean that providers are failing to comply with the rules. It is partially a reflection on the lack of resources, but also the prioritization of the Department of Justice. The DOJ has made it very clear that they do not intend to prosecute HIPAA criminal violations. Frankly, many criminal violations of HIPAA would also be violations of other criminal statutes. (HIPAA does not make it crime to inadvertently disclose PHI, there has to be some level of criminal intent.) Individuals such as the gentlemen out west who was convicted of a criminal violation of HIPAA will still be subject to criminal prosecution for obtaining patient PHI for their own use, with or without HIPAA prosecutions. In that case, the defendant was charged with a number of other federal crimes, but pled to a violation of HIPAA. The other complaint is using a complaint driven enforcement model. Many federal regulations are enforced through a complaint driven model. I can think of two examples, wage and hour regulations and EEOC. Both of these regulations are sweeping and more directly affect individuals than HIPAA. However, the enforcement of these matters is driven almost exclusively by complain and they are enforced quite thoroughly. Complaint driven models can be a very effective way to enforce a regulatory scheme. All of the discussion of enforcement stems from a belief that without sweeping government regulations that are enforced vigorously, patient information will not be protected. However, patient information was protected for many years before HIPAA. Enacting HIPAA has created yet one more regulatory monster for health care providers to tame, but the large cost of HIPAA compliance has not resulted in a similarly large increase in the protection of patient confidentiality. Subjecting health care providers to even more draconian prosecution efforts in Sarbanes Oxley style HIPAA enforcement will only serve to drive the costs of compliance up, yet will not likely reap any further benefit in patient privacy. This is because health care professionals were going to great lengths to protect patient privacy before they began implementing HIPAA. Unlike other professions that are not regulated by federal laws, health care professionals took it as a fundamental matter of professionalism to keep patient information confidential. HIPAA compliance did not change a great deal for health care providers, except increasing by one the number of policies and procedures manuals on their shelves.
|
NewsHealth Care
[08/15] Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners Reports Second Quarter 2008 Financial Results Topics
Adminstrative Law Recent UpdatesJuly 18, 2008 May 29, 2008 May 28, 2008 May 13, 2008 May 08, 2008 Archives
July, 2007 Web ResourcesFindLaw |
|
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Copyright © 2008 by Home Care Law Blog Gilliland & Markette LLP. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. |